-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/18065/#review35771
-----------------------------------------------------------



ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/load_local_dir_test.q
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/18065/#comment66516>

    This test passes with or without the rest of the patch. It doesn't seem to 
demonstrate any change in behavior.


- Carl Steinbach


On Feb. 28, 2014, 8:03 a.m., Mohammad Islam wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/18065/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 28, 2014, 8:03 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive and Ashutosh Chauhan.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-6024
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6024
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Excerpt from the JIRA:
> "Load data command creates an additional copy task only when its loading from 
> local It doesn't create this additional copy task while loading from DFS 
> though."
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> itests/hive-unit/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/history/TestHiveHistory.java
>  8beef09 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/MoveTask.java ed7787d 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Hive.java 05a2da7 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/metadata/Table.java 8318be1 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/LoadSemanticAnalyzer.java 
> 59aeb96 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/plan/MoveWork.java 407450e 
>   ql/src/test/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/exec/TestExecDriver.java 5991aae 
>   ql/src/test/queries/clientpositive/load_local_dir_test.q PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/test/results/clientpositive/load_local_dir_test.q.out PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18065/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Ran some existing q tests with "LOAD DATA LOCAL INPATH".
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mohammad Islam
> 
>

Reply via email to