[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13935885#comment-13935885
]
Sergey Shelukhin commented on HIVE-6060:
----------------------------------------
some minor comments on RB. My main concern is that the feature is not well
integrated. Vectorized code is not supported; will it fall back now, error out,
or produce incorrect results? From discussion I understood it produces
incorrect results. Is it possible to for it to fall back to non-vectorized?
The other thing is that there's no way to go back. I'm not sure how bad it
is... if it can only be used in narrow explicit scenarios I guess that should
be ok.
> Define API for RecordUpdater and UpdateReader
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-6060
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6060
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Owen O'Malley
> Assignee: Owen O'Malley
> Attachments: HIVE-6060.patch, HIVE-6060.patch, HIVE-6060.patch,
> HIVE-6060.patch, HIVE-6060.patch, acid-io.patch, h-5317.patch, h-5317.patch,
> h-5317.patch, h-6060.patch, h-6060.patch
>
>
> We need to define some new APIs for how Hive interacts with the file formats
> since it needs to be much richer than the current RecordReader and
> RecordWriter.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
