[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13945418#comment-13945418
 ] 

Jitendra Nath Pandey commented on HIVE-5817:
--------------------------------------------

bq. It seems like I cannot make a repro for select... even though there are 
name collisions, the mappings are correct. Perhaps when someone finds a bug we 
can solve it .
HIVE-6349 patch includes a test that reproduces the problem for vectorized 
select. The patch also fixes the issue.

> column name to index mapping in VectorizationContext is broken
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-5817
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5817
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Vectorization
>    Affects Versions: 0.13.0
>            Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
>            Assignee: Remus Rusanu
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.13.0
>
>         Attachments: HIVE-5817-uniquecols.broken.patch, 
> HIVE-5817.00-broken.patch, HIVE-5817.4.patch, HIVE-5817.5.patch, 
> HIVE-5817.6.patch
>
>
> Columns coming from different operators may have the same internal names 
> ("_colNN"). There exists a query in the form {{select b.cb, a.ca from a JOIN 
> b ON ... JOIN x ON ...;}}  (distilled from a more complex query), which runs 
> ok w/o vectorization. With vectorization, it will run ok for most ca, but for 
> some ca it will fail (or can probably return incorrect results). That is 
> because when building column-to-VRG-index map in VectorizationContext, 
> internal column name for ca that the first map join operator adds to the 
> mapping may be the same as internal name for cb that the 2nd one tries to 
> add. 2nd VMJ doesn't add it (see code in ctor), and when it's time for it to 
> output stuff, it retrieves wrong index from the map by name, and then wrong 
> vector from VRG.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to