[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6784?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13965279#comment-13965279
]
Justin Coffey commented on HIVE-6784:
-------------------------------------
-1 on this patch.
Looping on the arraywriteable in deserialize() will cause a performance penalty
at read time, and running parseXxxx(obj.toString) in the event of a type
mismatch is also painful.
Changing types of columns is a rare event, we shouldn't write code that will
cause performance penalties to handle it. Users should recreate the table with
the new type and load it from the old table casting and converting as
appropriate in their query.
> parquet-hive should allow column type change
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-6784
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6784
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: File Formats, Serializers/Deserializers
> Affects Versions: 0.13.0
> Reporter: Tongjie Chen
> Fix For: 0.14.0
>
> Attachments: HIVE-6784.1.patch.txt, HIVE-6784.2.patch.txt
>
>
> see also in the following parquet issue:
> https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/issues/323
> Currently, if we change parquet format hive table using "alter table
> parquet_table change c1 c1 bigint " ( assuming original type of c1 is int),
> it will result in exception thrown from SerDe:
> "org.apache.hadoop.io.IntWritable cannot be cast to
> org.apache.hadoop.io.LongWritable" in query runtime.
> This is different behavior from hive (using other file format), where it will
> try to perform cast (null value in case of incompatible type).
> Parquet Hive's RecordReader returns an ArrayWritable (based on schema stored
> in footers of parquet files); ParquetHiveSerDe also creates an corresponding
> ArrayWritableObjectInspector (but using column type info from metastore).
> Whenever there is column type change, the objector inspector will throw
> exception, since WritableLongObjectInspector cannot inspect an IntWritable
> etc...
> Conversion has to happen somewhere if we want to allow type change. SerDe's
> deserialize method seems a natural place for it.
> Currently, serialize method calls createStruct (then createPrimitive) for
> every record, but it creates a new object regardless, which seems expensive.
> I think that could be optimized a bit by just returning the object passed if
> already of the right type. deserialize also reuse this method, if there is a
> type change, there will be new object to be created, which I think is
> inevitable.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
