[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14129572#comment-14129572
]
Rui Li commented on HIVE-8017:
------------------------------
I didn't update golden file for {{union_remove_25.q}} as the original total
size (6812) is the same with MR version. I think that's all right for now, as
long as we don't have diff in the query results.
> Use HiveKey instead of BytesWritable as key type of the pair RDD [Spark
> Branch]
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-8017
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8017
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: Spark
> Reporter: Rui Li
> Assignee: Rui Li
> Attachments: HIVE-8017-spark.patch, HIVE-8017.2-spark.patch,
> HIVE-8017.3-spark.patch, HIVE-8017.4-spark.patch
>
>
> HiveKey should be used as the key type because it holds the hash code for
> partitioning. While BytesWritable serves partitioning well for simple cases,
> we have to use {{HiveKey.hashCode}} for more complicated ones, e.g. join,
> bucketed table, etc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
