[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5799?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130136#comment-14130136
]
Brock Noland commented on HIVE-5799:
------------------------------------
Hi [~navis],
I had a quick question but the code below. Is the case where operationTimeout
< 0 a normal case? If not, should we return false there?
{noformat}
+ if (operationTimeout > 0) {
+ // check only when it's in terminal state
+ return state.isTerminal() && lastAccessTime + operationTimeout <=
current;
+ }
+ return lastAccessTime + -operationTimeout <= current;
{noformat}
> session/operation timeout for hiveserver2
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HIVE-5799
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-5799
> Project: Hive
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: HiveServer2
> Reporter: Navis
> Assignee: Navis
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: TODOC14
> Fix For: 0.14.0
>
> Attachments: HIVE-5799.1.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.10.patch.txt,
> HIVE-5799.11.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.12.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.13.patch.txt,
> HIVE-5799.14.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.15.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.16.patch.txt,
> HIVE-5799.17.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.2.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.3.patch.txt,
> HIVE-5799.4.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.5.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.6.patch.txt,
> HIVE-5799.7.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.8.patch.txt, HIVE-5799.9.patch.txt
>
>
> Need some timeout facility for preventing resource leakages from instable or
> bad clients.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
