[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Jimmy Xiang reassigned HIVE-8621:
---------------------------------

    Assignee: Jimmy Xiang

> Dump small table join data for map-join [Spark Branch]
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-8621
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8621
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Suhas Satish
>            Assignee: Jimmy Xiang
>
> This jira aims to re-use a slightly modified approach of map-reduce 
> distributed cache in spark to dump map-joined small tables as hash tables 
> onto spark DFS cluster. 
> This is a sub-task of map-join for spark 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7613
> This can use the baseline patch for map-join
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8616
> The original thought process was to use broadcast variable concept in spark, 
> for the small tables. 
> The number of broadcast variables that must be created is m x n where
> 'm' is  the number of small tables in the (m+1) way join and n is the number 
> of buckets of tables. If unbucketed, n=1
> But it was discovered that objects compressed with kryo serialization on 
> disk, can occupy 20X or more when deserialized in-memory. For bucket join, 
> the spark Driver has to hold all the buckets (for bucketed tables) in-memory 
> (to provide for fault-tolerance against Executor failures) although the 
> executors only need individual buckets in their memory. So the broadcast 
> variable approach may not be the right approach. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to