> On Nov. 5, 2014, 9:23 p.m., Szehon Ho wrote:
> > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java,
> >  line 188
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27640/diff/1/?file=750693#file750693line188>
> >
> >     Can you elaborate why we need this assumption?  This may not be true in 
> > all cases.

Actually, we don't need this assumption anymore. I'll remove it.


> On Nov. 5, 2014, 9:23 p.m., Szehon Ho wrote:
> > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java,
> >  line 141
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27640/diff/1/?file=750693#file750693line141>
> >
> >     Please use proper javadoc notation for your javadocs.

I didn't use javadoc since it's a private method. Maybe I can write a better 
description on what it does?


- Chao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27640/#review60031
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 5, 2014, 8:29 p.m., Suhas Satish wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27640/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 5, 2014, 8:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive, Chao Sun, Jimmy Xiang, Szehon Ho, and Xuefu Zhang.
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This replaces ReduceSinks with HashTableSinks in smaller tables for a 
> map-join. But the condition check field to detect map-join is actually being 
> set in CommonJoinResolver, which doesnt exist yet. We need to decide where is 
> the right place to populate this field. 
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/parse/spark/SparkCompiler.java 
> 795a5d7 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27640/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Suhas Satish
> 
>

Reply via email to