> On Nov. 8, 2014, 12:44 a.m., Szehon Ho wrote: > > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java, > > line 224 > > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/diff/3/?file=754597#file754597line224> > > > > I've been thinking about this, as you had brought up a pretty rare > > use-case where a big-table parent of mapjoin1 still had a HTS , but its for > > another(!) mapjoin. I dont know if this is still a valid case , but do you > > think this handles it, as it just indisciriminately adds it to the parent > > map if it has HTS?
Fixed through a offline chat. - Chao ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/#review60380 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Nov. 7, 2014, 6:07 p.m., Chao Sun wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Nov. 7, 2014, 6:07 p.m.) > > > Review request for hive. > > > Bugs: HIVE-8622 > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8622 > > > Repository: hive-git > > > Description > ------- > > This is a sub-task of map-join for spark > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7613 > This can use the baseline patch for map-join > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8616 > > > Diffs > ----- > > > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java > PRE-CREATION > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/plan/SparkWork.java 66fd6b6 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Chao Sun > >