> On Nov. 8, 2014, 12:44 a.m., Szehon Ho wrote:
> > ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java,
> >  line 224
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/diff/3/?file=754597#file754597line224>
> >
> >     I've been thinking about this, as you had brought up a pretty rare 
> > use-case where a big-table parent of mapjoin1 still had a HTS , but its for 
> > another(!) mapjoin.  I dont know if this is still a valid case , but do you 
> > think this handles it, as it just indisciriminately adds it to the parent 
> > map if it has HTS?

Fixed through a offline chat.


- Chao


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/#review60380
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Nov. 7, 2014, 6:07 p.m., Chao Sun wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 7, 2014, 6:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for hive.
> 
> 
> Bugs: HIVE-8622
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8622
> 
> 
> Repository: hive-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a sub-task of map-join for spark 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-7613
> This can use the baseline patch for map-join
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-8616
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   
> ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/optimizer/physical/SparkMapJoinResolver.java
>  PRE-CREATION 
>   ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/plan/SparkWork.java 66fd6b6 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/27627/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Chao Sun
> 
>

Reply via email to