On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 2:13 PM Hans Van Akelyen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All, > > We have come at a point that we should discuss creating our first Apache > release version. > One of our mentors suggested that our first release be a source code only > release to reduce complexity of the release and to see if our code passes > the checks done by the IPMC. I suspect that our mentors will also first > take a good look at this first candidate and point us to possible issues. > > We have checked all the dependencies we currently use and have the > following ticket to do the follow up on work items [1]. Question to the > mentors, does this have to be included in the release somewhere? release > notes/disclaimer ? > > Another thing that has also already been done is checking all header files, > we have a couple of files that will need removal in the future when an > alternative is created. These files have been listed in the LICENSE file > [2]. Mentors, is this sufficient? > > So to summarize, does everyone feel comfortable with a source only release > as a first version? > +1 for source code only release and documenting the entire release process. > And do the mentors see any red flags or have a list somewhere on things > that are checked, I went over [3] and it looks like we comply. > > Cheers, > Hans > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HOP-2182 > [2] > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/blob/20aea10eaf497cf1be7251af4e352deb1cc6a53a/LICENSE#L206 > [3] https://incubator.apache.org/guides/releasemanagement.html >
