Big +1 with Julian :)

regards,

François
[email protected]
[email protected]

Le 10/09/2021 à 17:10, Julian Hyde a écrit :
> Separately from release 1.0, I think Hop should be considering graduation.  A 
> reminder of the process: the community decides that they are ready to 
> graduate, passes a vote, the Incubator has a discussion and a vote, then 
> submits a motion for the next Board meeting.
>
> I am glad that we are keeping releases separate from graduation. But “Apache 
> Hop 1.0” sounds a bit more impressive than “Apache Hop 1.0 (Incubating)”. 
> Just saying. ;)
>
> Julian
>
>> On Sep 10, 2021, at 7:47 AM, Matt Casters <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hops!
>>
>> The list of tickets
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12350233> for 1.0
>> seems to be getting shorter every day so I think it's time to release our
>> iconic 1.0 lest we want to end up in a Duke Nukem Forever scenario.
>>
>> Anyway, Hop is looking fantastic and I detect some pressure left and right
>> to dig in again with new and bigger features and improvements. Doing those
>> on 1.0 seems like a bad idea.  Let's cut a 1.0 release instead somewhere
>> next week and move the master snapshot version to 1.1.0
>>
>> I would propose to do the sensible and simple thing and release minor
>> versions going forward in a Major.Minor.Patch version naming scheme.  I
>> know a lot of other projects like Beam only release patch level 0 but it
>> doesn't hurt to have it just in case we make a horrible mistake
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-807> along the way.
>>
>> The major versions I would reserve for the larger architectural changes and
>> in fact I wouldn't wait too long to start working on 2.x with support for
>> Java 11.
>>
>> As far as compatibility is concerned I would first and foremost focus on
>> the Hop execution engines on existing metadata. The integration tests are
>> our best friends.  Java API changes shouldn't concern us too much unless
>> they occur in the core of our stack and IMO are of lesser importance for
>> plugins.
>>
>> Ideas for making noise about 1.0 are also welcome!
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Matt

Reply via email to