Ok for the 1.0.0 rather than 1.0.0.RC1, I missed the discussion about that.

+1 for the vote and good job guys for the first major release!

regards,

François
[email protected]
[email protected]

Le 23/09/2021 à 09:31, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit :
> Hi François,
>
> You are right, I should not have had it marked as released. I have
> "unreleased" the version and changed the number to 1.0.0.
> It was during the final weeks that we decided to go for Major.Minor.Patch
> and our work in progress was 1.0-SNAPSHOT.
>
> In the mail for general incubator and our communication to the end users we
> will use the link you provided, it did not come to my mind that the first
> one would not work when not logged in to Jira.
>
> On the last part I am not sure, Julian also said we had to remove the -rc1
> from the archives we were making as when releasing from staging to release
> in dist you are doing an svn move so the top folder should contain the
> candidate name but not the actual artifacts.
>
> If a vote succeeds we are not supposed to change the version in the pom as
> it would affect the checksums and require re-creating and re-signing the
> artifacts.
>
> we are still releasing "1.0.0" when the vote on the candidate passes.
>
> Cheers,
> Hans
>
>
> On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 09:12, Francois Papon <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It's better to share the public release note because people can see
>> without login into Jira:
>>
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12324323&version=12350233
>>
>> Another side note, it's better to change the version to "released" after
>> the end of the vote.
>>
>> The version is 1.0.0-RC1 but the version in Jira is 1.0.
>>
>> In the pom.xml of the source I can see that the version is 1.0.0 and I
>> think it should be 1.0.0.RC1.
>>
>> The users can be confused about the version.
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> François
>> [email protected]
>> [email protected]
>>
>> Le 21/09/2021 à 14:10, Hans Van Akelyen a écrit :
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> After a thorough testing period for Hop 0.99, we are ready to release
>>> version 1.0.0 to the public. All issues raised during the previous
>> release
>>> have been resolved. Dubious code has either been rewritten or removed
>> from
>>> this release.
>>>
>>> This release contains no new features, only further cleanup and code
>>> hardening has been done. I would like to thank everyone that participated
>>> in filing, testing and resolving issues.
>>>
>>> Build instructions can be found in the README included.
>>>
>>> The tag to be voted on is 1.0.0rc1 (commit 8a1fc96 ):
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-hop/tree/1.0.0-rc1
>>>
>>> The release files, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hop/apache-hop-1.0.0-incubating-rc1/
>>> The SHA512 Checksum for these artifacts is:
>>> Source:
>> b7e2fdf14fcacaf937bf3e4ffedba6870a0b97965c97e0be0013acde308e161035fce5dfcb5254f96194cfe7a944bcfd5b3d8541b51435f732d0a5f61e498550
>>> Client:
>> f9dd913c09a547a21e0c0c26ec71040dd34b753e83d4638982a1e5b525f4219e2e33c54989305461c793ecdd779ffab953f65872f5d809267938fd62ddf123c2
>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>> https://keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x9a8a628dd4f4aa1e
>>>
>>> For more information about the contents of this release, see:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/HOP/versions/12350233
>>>
>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0!
>>>
>>> The vote is open for 72 hours and passes if
>>> a majority of at least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Hop (incubating) 1.0.0
>>> [ ] +0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Hans
>>>

Reply via email to