Hi Julian,

Thanks for the input and pragmatic approach on dissecting the mission
statement.

I really like "an intuitive and productive tool for data engineers" as the
end result of your thought process.

Cheers,
Hans

On Mon, 15 Nov 2021 at 10:56, Sergio Ramazzina (SERASOFT) <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I also agree on 'A platform for data orchestration'
>
> Cheers
>
> Sergio
>
> Il 15/11/2021 06:10, Julian Hyde ha scritto:
> > In my opinion, for mission statements, less is more. So I’m going to
> whittle this down to the bone and y’all should holler if I take it too far.
> >
> > So, some other ideas for what could go:
> >
> > I’m glad you took out ‘implemented in Java’ (because we don’t want to
> prevent ourselves from moving to other languages).
> > Take out 'visual development' (because it is implied by wanting to make
> the tool approachable to all skill levels, and we don’t want to preclude
> code-driven approaches).
> > Take out the origin of the name '(Hop Orchestration Platform)’. It’s
> history, not mission.
> > Take out the ‘aims to’. As Yoda says, ’there is no try’.
> > Take out ‘complete’ (who wants an incomplete platform?)
> > I wouldn’t add a mention of plugins. All platforms support plugins!
> > I think that ’testing and deployment’ and ‘auditing’ are implied
> (somewhat) by ‘complex orchestration and lifecycle requirements'
> >
> > So, we’re down to this:
> >
> >    Hop lets people of various skill levels
> >    be productive in even the most complex data engineering and data
> >    orchestration projects.
> >    Hop is a platform that spans the entire project life cycle.
> >
> > Wordsmithing gets this down to:
> >
> >    Hop is a platform for data engineering, easy for novice
> >    users but scaling to projects with complex orchestration
> >    and lifecycle requirements.
> >
> > The text has to follow “related to”, so the above becomes
> >
> >    a tool and platform for data engineering, easy for novice
> >    users but scaling to projects with complex orchestration
> >    and lifecycle requirements
> >
> > FWIW, Calcite’s mission statement was
> >
> >    parsing and planning queries on data in a
> >    wide variety of formats
> >
> > Hive’s was
> >
> >    parallel analysis of large data sets
> >
> > Kafka’s was
> >
> >    a distributed publish/subscribe stream
> >    processing framework
> >
> > So, can we cut Hop’s statement down any further? Say
> >
> >    an intuitive and productive tool for data engineers
> >
> > or
> >
> >    a platform for data orchestration
> >
> > Julian
> >
> > [1] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Calcite.html#2015-10-21 <
> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Calcite.html#2015-10-21>
> >
> > [2] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Hive.html#2010-09-22 <
> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Hive.html#2010-09-22>
> >
> > [3] https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Kafka.html#2012-11-21 <
> https://whimsy.apache.org/board/minutes/Kafka.html#2012-11-21>
> >
> >> On Nov 14, 2021, at 7:50 AM, Nicolas ADMENT <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Bart,
> >>
> >> The mission statement looks good! I would eventually just add the notion
> >> that it can be easily customized with plugins.
> >>
> >> *Hop is a complete and customizable platform that covers the entire
> project
> >> life cycle.*
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Nicolas
> >>
> >> Le dim. 14 nov. 2021 à 08:44, Bart Maertens <[email protected]> a
> >> écrit :
> >>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts on this as an updated mission statement?
> >>>
> >>> Hop (Hop Orchestration Platform) aims to let people of various skill
> levels
> >>> be productive in even the most complex data engineering and data
> >>> orchestration projects.
> >>> Hop aims to be a complete platform that spans the entire project life
> >>> cycle, from visual development over testing and deployment to auditing
> and
> >>> analysis.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Bart
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 9:06 PM Julian Hyde <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> The next step will be an internal vote to let the community decide if
> >>>> they
> >>>>> think Apache Hop (Incubating) is ready to graduate as a Top Level
> >>>> Project.
> >>>>
> >>>> If I recall correctly, the vote is typically on the text of the
> >>> graduation
> >>>> proposal. Included in that text are the initial PMC and chair (done)
> but
> >>>> also the mission statement of the project. Formally, we need to agree
> the
> >>>> values <Name> and <Mission statement> to substitute into the template.
> >>>>
> >>>> Bart’s previous message to the IPMC had the variables <Name> = “Hop”
> and
> >>>> <Mission statement> = "short for the Hop Orchestration Platform.
> Written
> >>>> completely in Java it aims to provide a wide range of data
> orchestration
> >>>> tools, including a visual development environment, servers,   metadata
> >>>> analysis, auditing services and so on. As a platform, Hop also wants
> to
> >>> be
> >>>> a reusable library so that it can be easily reused by other software.”
> >>>> substituted into the template
> >>>>
> >>>>   Establish the Apache <Name> Project
> >>>>
> >>>>   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best
> >>>>   interests of the Foundation and consistent with the
> >>>>   Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management
> >>>>   Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of
> >>>>   open-source software, for distribution at no charge to the
> >>>>   public, related to <a clear mission statement>
> >>>>
> >>>>   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that a Project Management
> >>>>   Committee (PMC), to be known as the "Apache <Name> Project", be
> >>>>   and hereby is established pursuant to Bylaws of the Foundation;
> >>>>   and be it further
> >>>>
> >>>>   RESOLVED,that the Apache <Name> Project be and hereby is
> >>>>   responsible for the creation and maintenance of software
> >>>>   related to <same mission statement>.
> >>>>
> >>>>   RESOLVED, that the office of "Vice President, Apache <Name>" be
> >>>>   and hereby is created, the person holding such office to serve
> >>>>   at the direction of the Board of Directors as the chair of the
> >>>>   Apache <Name> Project, and to have primary responsibility for
> >>>>   management of the projects within the scope of responsibility
> >>>>   of the Apache <Name> Project; and be it further
> >>>>
> >>>>   RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and
> >>>>   hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the
> >>>>   Apache <Name> Project:
> >>>>
> >>>>   << here, list out each PMC member, in the format of
> >>>>   * First Last <apache email>
> >>>>   NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that <Elected VP> be
> >>>>   appointed to the office of Vice President, Apache <Name>, to
> >>>>   serve in accordance with and subject to the direction of the
> >>>>   Board of Directors and the Bylaws of the Foundation until
> >>>>   death, resignation, retirement, removal or disqualification,
> >>>>   or until a successor is appointed; and be it further
> >>>>
> >>>>   RESOLVED, that the initial Apache <Name> PMC be and hereby is
> >>>>   tasked with the creation of a set of bylaws intended to
> >>>>   encourage open development and increased participation in the
> >>>>   Apache <Name> Project; and be it further
> >>>>
> >>>>   RESOLVED, that the Apache <Name> Project be and hereby is tasked
> >>>>   with the migration and rationalization of the Apache Incubator
> >>>>   <Name> podling; and be it further
> >>>>
> >>>>   RESOLVED, that all responsibilities pertaining to the Apache
> >>>>   Incubator <Name> podling encumbered upon the Apache Incubator
> >>>>   Project are hereafter discharged.
> >>>>
> >>>> In my opinion the current mission statement is too long and should be
> >>>> tightened up.
> >>>>
> >>>> Julian
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
>

Reply via email to