Hi all, I see no objections, so I will be moving forward with this.
Cheers, Hans On 7 May 2024 at 08:16 +0200, Bart Maertens <[email protected]>, wrote: > having milestones on issues seems more important than having them on PRs. > thanks for taking the time to dig into this, Hans! > > > On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 10:37 AM <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > A while back I improved our GH Actions a bit to automatically add the > > milestone to a GH Issue when using the .take-issue option. > > At that point in time I also thought it was a good idea to do this on our > > PR's so we could easily identify which PR's were getting merged for a > > milestone. > > > > Unfortunately it seems doing this is skewing our solved/closed tickets > > [1]. I have taken a look at some other projects under the ASF umbrella and > > it seems most of them are not tagging PR's with a milestone. I would like > > to revert this change (and even change the action to remove a milestone if > > one was attached during PR creation). I feel this will give us the best > > representation of the actual work done. > > > > Let me know what you think. > > > > Cheers, > > Hans > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/hop/issues?q=is%3Aclosed+milestone%3A2.9 > >
