I'd vote against mvn site and towards something a little better looking. Maybe the template for what's already on htrace.org + Sphinx for docs ?
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > How should we do the website? Jake set up the svnpubsub for us so we'd > generate the static site and then publish it only, we have no 'website' > currently. > > I could do a little fixup and then generate the site with 'mvn site'. > That'd be easy (if ugly). Going forward, changing the website, you'd edit, > stage, and the svn commit to deploy (a minor burden). > > We have a bit of markdown carried over the github deploy. If our site used > 'apache cms' [1][2], we could just put up our little bit of *.md. Devs > could just login and edit the site; there would be no build, publish step. > > Jake, is it even possible to move to 'apache cms' post setup? > > Any other opinions out there on how to proceed? > Thanks, > St.Ack > > 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/sites.html > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/cms.html >
