Do we want to have a binary tar.gz? Right now it doesn't make much sense but it will be more practical later.
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok. I've put up a pre-RC in case anyone wants to take a looksee at the > layout/form, here [1] and here [2]. I'll go ahead and move these artifacts > to become our first RC tomorrow unless I get feedback otherwise (For first > release was going to do just a src tarball only. My thinking is we can do > binary artifacts later on when we have more doc and stuff better hookedup). > > Thanks, > St.Ack > > 1. http://people.apache.org/~stack/htrace/ > 2. > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/htrace/ > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks Jake. We'd be lost w/o you. INFRA-8940 > > St.Ack > > > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Jake Farrell <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> The project needs to be setup in nexus, can you create an infra ticket > >> with > >> the nexus component please > >> > >> -Jake > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > I put up HTRACE-23 which has changes to build a src tgz. I was > >> thinking a > >> > src tarball good enough for our first release out of incubator. I was > >> > thinking we can do the binary tarball later when we have fancy htraced > >> all > >> > working. Hows' that sound? > >> > > >> > Anyone have clue why I cannot publish htrace snapshot? Says 401 not > >> > authorized (see below). I can publish hbase snapshots so unlikely my > >> > credentials are the problem. Do I need to blessed for htrace? > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > St.Ack > >> > > >> > Caused by: > org.apache.maven.wagon.authorization.AuthorizationException: > >> > Access denied to: > >> > > >> > > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/htrace/htrace/3.1.0-SNAPSHOT/htrace-3.1.0-20141223.230636-1.pom > >> > , > >> > ReasonPhrase: Forbidden. > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.maven.wagon.shared.http4.AbstractHttpClientWagon.put(AbstractHttpClientWagon.java:618) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.maven.wagon.shared.http4.AbstractHttpClientWagon.put(AbstractHttpClientWagon.java:524) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.maven.wagon.shared.http4.AbstractHttpClientWagon.put(AbstractHttpClientWagon.java:505) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.apache.maven.wagon.shared.http4.AbstractHttpClientWagon.put(AbstractHttpClientWagon.java:485) > >> > at > >> > > >> > > >> > org.sonatype.aether.connector.wagon.WagonRepositoryConnector$PutTask.run(WagonRepositoryConnector.java:811) > >> > > >> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Ok. Billie. Thanks. I'd be up for making a point release soon after > to > >> > get > >> > > a HTRACE-5 in to make dependent project happy. > >> > > St.Ack > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Billie Rinaldi <[email protected]> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> I'm still trying to figure out what's going on. I think you should > >> go > >> > >> ahead with the release at this point. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Billie > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Any luck w/ HTRACE-5 Billie? (I see HTRACE-6 went in). > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Thanks, > >> > >> > St.Ack > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Billie Rinaldi < > [email protected] > >> > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > I wouldn't mind getting HTRACE-6 in; that will be an easy one. > >> I'm > >> > >> > > investigating HTRACE-5 today and will post whatever I discover. > >> > >> > > On Dec 15, 2014 9:33 PM, "Stack" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Unless objection, I'll put up an RC in the next day or so > >> (Maybe I > >> > >> > should > >> > >> > > > wait on Billie getting in what she needs for accumulo?). The > >> > master > >> > >> > > branch > >> > >> > > > is in a state that roughly equates to the 3.0.4 release > caveat > >> the > >> > >> new > >> > >> > > > packaging and some extras like the 'site' and Colin's work in > >> core > >> > >> but > >> > >> > > > otherwise, its effectively the same functionality. > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > Thanks, > >> > >> > > > St.Ack > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
