On Wednesday 22 August 2001 20:58, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2001 at 03:59:56PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > On Wed, 2001-08-22 at 15:41, Brian Pane wrote:
> > > Ian Holsman wrote:
> > > >On Wed, 2001-08-22 at 14:12, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> > > >>We had binary tables, but we removed them, because that is what hash
> > > >>tables are for.
> > > >
> > > >agreed.
> > > >but there are no hash tables on the request rec structure.
>
> Yes there is. apr_pool_userdata_set(..., r->pool)
>
> > > >My problem is that I have a module which implements a custom SSI tag
> > > > and a 'postfix' hook.
> > > >the postfix hook sets up the key based on the incoming request.
>
> apr_pool_userdata_set("ian-ssi-tag-data", data, apr_pool_cleanup_null,
> r->pool);
>
> > > >when the SSI tag gets called (~10-50 per page) it needs to get the key
> > > >the postfix hook had set up.
>
> apr_pool_userdata_get(&data, "ian-ssi-tag-data", r->pool);
>
> >...
> >
> > > How about changing request_rec->notes to a hash table? This would be
> > > a relatively simple change, as the notes field isn't used in a huge
> > > number of places in the standard modules.
>
> No need. IMO, r->notes should just go away. It is pointless nowadays.
++1
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
