Guenter,
About 90% of the NetWare specific changes for the APR layer have been checked
into CVS. I am still working on the final 10% (which is usually the hardest). It may
not look that way only because we were able to piggy back most of the NetWare code on
Unix. This is a good thing for us because it means that we didn't have to rewrite a
lot of code. I still have to organize some of the platform specific header files and
get some of the kinks worked out in the project file, but we are close to having and
APR layer that should work with the HTTPD server. In theory as soon as we get APR
complete, there shouldn't be any additional work necessary to make Apache 2.0 run. Of
course a theory is just a theory until it is proven and we won't have the proof until
APR is complete for NetWare :).
thanks,
Brad
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Monday, August 27, 2001 10:05:23 AM >>>
Hi Bill,
> Please bring this discussion to Apache 2.0. I know Brad Nicholes and
> company at Novell
> are working hard to support Apache 2.0. This implementation will be a far
> more secure and
> stable platform than the 1.3 hybrid/threaded implementations
> (win32/os2/netware etc.)
> If we direct our energies at solving the problem there, and we can agree
> on a mechansim,
> I see this issue being resolved in Apache 2.0.
at this time we cannot discuss anything about NetWare and 2.0 because the NetWare OS
dependent files are not in CVS tree so we cannot build a 2.0 NetWare version...
Guenter.
