Hi Sander. is it possible to post patches from the most recent CVS version. that would make it much easier for people to apply them Thanks ..Ian On Sun, 2001-08-26 at 08:29, Sander Striker wrote: > [this time including the attachment...] > > > Hi, > > > > It seems that the memory management requirements for > > buckets is that they have to be able to control their > > own lifetime. In other words, they need to be allocated > > and freed on an individual basis. > > It seems that their lifetime is bound by the lifetime > > of the connection. > > > > The above let me believe that buckets need a free > > function to complement apr_palloc. Hence the > > attached patch that introduces apr_pfree *). I know > > this patch introduces some extra overhead, although > > not much, which could be unacceptable. OTOH would > > this make it possible to use one memory management > > scheme throughout apache... > > > > Maybe something to consider, maybe not. I don't > > even know if these are the criteria or not ;) > > > > > > Sander > > > > *) patch is against the recently posted possible > > replacement code for pools. > -- Ian Holsman Performance Measurement & Analysis CNET Networks - 415 364-8608
