On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:07:26PM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 08:05:27PM -0700, Ian Holsman wrote:
> > Some performance results with mod_gz are available at
> > http://webperf.org/a2/v25/
> > (no core dumps.. pages look ok on a real browser while running test)
> > I'm going to be re-running the tests for a longer period to see if
> > there are memory leaks (as well as quantify/purify on it next week)
> >
> > brief summary:
> > * numbers are based on pages going through mod-include
> > * once of the runs looks a bit flaky.. and I'm re-running it
> > * cpu usage (USR) is VERY high (from 100 without gz to 500)
> > * page requests down 16% when using GZ
What does this mean? Total bytes transferred? If so, then why only 16%
The number of page requests should be constant, unless mod_gz introduces
some kind of caching.
> > * page resposne times are slower with GZ, but have a lower deviation
>
> The expectation is that the network bandwidth used should be much
> lower. The tradeoff is that the CPU should get nailed. -- justin
Also: latency should increase and delivery time should decrease.
cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
