On Thursday 06 September 2001 14:17, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> From: "Ryan Bloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:09 AM
>
> > On Thursday 06 September 2001 07:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > bnicholes 01/09/06 07:48:46
> > >
> > > Modified: src/os/netware mod_tls.c
> > > Log:
> > > Added the ability for MOD_TLS to take advantage of the mutual
> > > authentication functionality built into Winsock and NILE on NetWare
> >
> > Mod_tls isn't ever really used, because mod_ssl has the exact same
> > filters. Is there a chance you can port this to mod_ssl? I will be
> > removing mod_tls later this week.
>
> If this module will come forward from 1.3 (where it was supported) it would
> have to land in modules/arch/netware/ --- second, this is kernel level
> support of SSL which is entirely different (IMHO) than mod_ssl.
>
> To be fair, mod_tls (winsock) has been around longer. However, mod_tls is
> a little too vague to be used this way. So, Brad, would you be willing to
> remove this module from the core, given that everyone shares mod_ssl, and
> that mod_ssl offers a more comprehensive and supported ssl/tls
> architecture? If not willing, please describe for the list what it is and
> why it aught to remain, and if you are willing to rename it to
> mod_winsock_tls to avoid ambiguity?
>
> Now if Brian wants to keep/Ryan wants to remove, then fine, we need a vote.
> But this module has been around for a number of 1.3 subrevisions, and
> cannot be axed by one individual's opinions. It isn't easy to be accepted
> as a new module. It must be equally difficult to be pulled from the core.
To clarify, I am removing mod_tls from 2.0. I saw mod_tls, and didn't connect it
with Apache 1.3. I will not remove mod_tls from 1.3 this week.
Ryan
______________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------
