Thanks Jim... I tried to understand PERL, but that goes far beyond my
comprehension ability :)
Pier
"Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll look into it... I have some spare cycles this weekend.
>
> Ryan Bloom wrote:
>>
>> On Friday 07 September 2001 21:50, Stas Bekman wrote:
>>> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>>>> "Bill Stoddard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> I'd like to tag and roll Apache 1.3.21. Anyone have anything they
>>>>> would like to get in first? I believe there are some proxy patches and
>>>>> some misc fixes to 1.3.20 and that's about it. Not in any hurry but I
>>>>> would like to do it sometime in the next few weeks. Opinions?
>>>>
>>>> Before rolling... Can someone check out why sometimes LD_SHLIB is not
>>>> defined in APXS (seems to be a problem with RedHat 7.1)? Pretty please
>>>> with sugar on top? (Or at least give me an hint on how to link a DSO when
>>>> 'apxs -q LD_SHLIB' doesn't report anything).
>>>
>>> the only thing apxs does on -q KEY is parsing build/config_vars.mk and
>>> giving you the value of the requested key. Now, LD_SHLIB is not listed in
>>> this file (at least not in mine). So the fix is to make it appear there,
>>> and requires no changes to apxs.
>>>
>>> BTW, grepping the sources for LD_SHLIB doesn't come up with anything but
>>> apxs.in, so I don't think anybody generates it at all.
>>
>> Pier is asking about Apache 1.3, not 2.0. :-)
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>
