On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 04:11:16AM -0400, Chuck Murcko wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, September 11, 2001, at 04:01 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:
>
> >> Rather than doing that, why don't we work on the rollup mechanism
> >> instead?
> >> Proxy has been moving along terrifically while in its own CVS module.
> >
> > We can do this too - but then I'd say we would need to finalise the
> > rollup release issue before we can go GA. Who is willing to sort out the
> > rollup release?
>
> Most of the stuff to build a rollup release is already running in the
> proxy builds.
My suggestion is to take what you learned in proxy, and establish the
httpd-rollup project (I posted on this earlier, something with "rollup" in
the subject).
Since you guys have already been doing it, then it makes sense to formalize
that into a project. The project would mostly just be some scripts and
things, but it could grab code from "anywhere" to roll together a release.
Hell... we haven't even started talking about bundling some of our Java and
XML tools with the web server. Lots of neat things that could happen there,
too.
I'm +1 on creating httpd-rollup, and -0.5 on putting proxy back in.
[ if (since?) mod_ldap is going out, then we have to deal with the rollup
anyways, which would totally kill any impetus for putting proxy back in.
thus, I'm against bringing proxy back into the core. ]
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
