On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:07:13AM -0700, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> On Monday 17 September 2001 11:04 am, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> 
> I know what the mails were about.  I am simply stating that it is still completely
> bogus.

I disagree.

It should be SIGUSR1 everywhere.  As a compromise, I allowed configure
to use SIGWINCH on Linux 2.0.  Would it make more sense to give a fatal 
error on that platform?  -- justin

Reply via email to