On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > be forgiving of the input, strict in the output ;) > > If the user 'asks' for a rollup, they aught to get a complete package, > unless it is _clearly_ labeled as an incremental. Yep. > I'm leaning, more and more, to offer both options, -complete (no > questions asked, download nothing more) and -all-extras (well, no +1... although I'd say drop the "-all" part and just call it "-extras". =-) --Cliff -------------------------------------------------------------- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Forma... Ryan Bloom
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Chuck Murcko
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format William A. Rowe, Jr.
- RE: Q1: Rollup Release Format MATHIHALLI,MADHUSUDAN (HP-Cupertino,ex1)
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Ian Holsman
- RE: Q1: Rollup Release Format Cliff Woolley
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format William A. Rowe, Jr.
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Cliff Woolley
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Graham Leggett
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Graham Leggett
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Chuck Murcko
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Chuck Murcko
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Graham Leggett
- Re: Q1: Rollup Release Format Roy T. Fielding