This is a weird one. See my reply below for my thoughts.
In short, the answer is no because forte is screaming about the double
declaration of mutex - which seems to be a valid error. The mutex
in include/multithread.h really needs to be namespace-protected.
Original message here:
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&group=comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix&selm=d1efd44f.0109190840.24ca4739%40posting.google.com
-- justin
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 00:52:14 -0700
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Is building Apache 1.3.20 with Solaris
> CC 6.0 or 5.0 possible?
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Erenkrantz)
> Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix
> Subject: Re: Is building Apache 1.3.20 with Solaris
> CC 6.0 or 5.0 possible?
> References:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.13.179.162
> Message-ID:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nick Lindridge) wrote in
> message
>
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Hi,
> >
> > The answer is of of course yes, but has anyone actually built Apache
> > with Forte or CC 5 recently for Solaris 7 or 8? Trying regular CC,
> > compat 5 and compat 4 all give up for the same reasons, and I wondered
> > if there are any config options that I've missed to get past the
> > obvious problems. An example build gets a little way and then the
> > output below.
> >
> > Not sure which is going to be the least pain at this point -
> > installing gcc or fixing up the includes.
>
> Wow. It's broken. I'll take a look at it in a few days.
> In the meantime, I'd suggest gcc. sunfreeware.com has
> pre-built binaries you can download.
>
> Odd that we haven't caught this before...
>
> /usr/include/sys/mutex.h is getting included which defines a
> structure called mutex. I wonder why gcc isn't complaining
> about it. I wonder if it defines _ASM. For the complete
> path, sys/mutex.h is included from sys/t_lock.h which is
> included from sys/file.h which is included from ap_config.h.
> The only way to work around this might be to define _ASM
> before ap_config.h includes sys/file.h. That's a hack
> though.
>
> Otherwise, it looks like we may need to go on a type-rename
> hunt in Apache 1.3. This won't be fixed until 1.3.21 (at the
> very least).
>
> I'm going to CC this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Feel free to
> keep an eye on the progress there.
>
> Justin Erenkrantz
----- End forwarded message -----
