From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 10:47 PM
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 10:40:20PM -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > > Make sure we run the new conf files through sed. > > > Now, the question is whether it might make more sense to have them > > > as ssl-std.conf, ldap-std.conf, and proxy-std.conf. > > > > > > (I'm also not sure if this is even shell portable or not.) > > > > > > I'll leave that up to OtherBill since he added these files. > > > > As the input source? Sure. I'll rename in just a bit if you want > > to twiddle the script. > > Actually, it'd copy it as ssl-std.conf. I dunno if that is what > we want or not. Do we want them to have an original like > httpd-std.conf? On Win32 we cache the httpd.default.conf version (already substituted) so the admin can go back to a known good point. I won't waste the effort copying a virgin file, just rewrite it to default.conf and then dup it to .conf.
