On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 11:25:16PM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 09:07:41PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote: > > 003_program_build: Contributed by Thom May, does autoconf substitutions > > on support/*. > > Not sure what this is doing. Why do we need autoconf substitution > in the support dir?
Well, the substitutions weren't happening before, for some reason. > > 004a_srclib_layout_support: Adds layout support to apr, apr-util and > > pcre. > > It would be great if you could please clean the style up (no tabs, > use APU instead of APRU for the prefix, etc.). You also should remove > the dependency upon the config.layout in httpd. For apr and apr-util, > they need to be buildable on their own (i.e. independent config.layout > files). I'm not seeing how that happens with your patch. I do think > this idea is worthwhile though. It doesn't depend on config-layout from httpd, I copy httpd's config.layout over to apr and apr-util for convenience at built time. I won't get the chance to really look at and clean up apache2 stuff for another couple of weeks due to exams, tho. > > 006_build_with_autoconf_2.5: Breaks with 2.13, this explicitly specifies > > 2.5 (Debian has the two in parallel, this is needed to make it use 2.5). > > Obviously, we're not going to apply this as we want 2.13 and 2.5 > support. No, what I'm saying is that apache2 doesn't (or didn't) build with 2.13, and Debian has the two in parallel. AC_PREREQ(2.5) forces the usage of 2.5 (Debian has a wrapper script which decides which one to use). > > 010_index.html.it_typo: Probably 1.3 material as well - Italian typo fix > > from a native speaker. > > I think someone already applied this to both trees. I know Latin, > not Italian. Indeed, it was applied. > > 011_mod_autoindex-symlink: Contributed patch to special case symlinks to > > files and directories in mod_autoindex - ^^SYMLINK^^ and ^^SYMDIR^^, > > respectively. > > Any reason why we should include this? Are there lots of people > who want this? It's not exactly a showstopper, but it can be useful. -- Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * james would be more impressed if netgod's magic powers could stop the splits in the first place... * netgod notes debian developers are notoriously hard to impress
