Just chatted with Greg (his key is now signed on pgp.mit.edu), and I've renamed the following to better get along with our mime-typing:
httpd-2_0_28-alpha.tar.gz.darwin[.asc] -> httpd-2_0_28-alpha-darwin.tar.gz[.asc] Both Greg and I are curious, will OS X users really grok their build is darwin, or will we need lots of colorful notes? Or, do we choose a different name? I've just moved up: httpd-2_0_28-alpha-win32.zip[.asc] includes the .rc and .mak file intermediates for the Win32 build schema. We need clearer docs in HEADER.html about source code 'flavors' at /dist/httpd/ before moving these to beta, to spare us the inevitable question, "Where are the binarys???" Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Greg Ames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "httpd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 4:19 PM Subject: 2_0_28 tarballs rolled and available > ...in http://dev.apache.org/dist/ . Please download, test, and vote for > beta. > > I made separate tarballs available for Mac OS X. Tarballs rolled with > daedalus's libtool do not work on Darwin, so I used libtool 1.4.2 for > that one. I used daedalus's libtool 1.4.2 for the others, which works > on HP-UX. I stuck a READ-ME.Darwin file in the directory so hopefully > Mac OS X users can figure it out. > > Thanks to Chuck M., Madhu, and Cliff for testing preliminary tarballs, > and to OtherBill and Justin for taking care of serious issues after the > original tag. > > Greg >
