Greg Ames wrote: > hmmmm...that's an interesting idea. I like it! I would bump the tag on > that file,
crap... I just looked at viewcvs. There's been two other changes to that file since the tag, one of which probably hit multiple files. It's starting too sound risky to pull in the patch. Why don't we go with commenting out the 401 error document, and include the patch in the release notes? Greg
