On Tuesday 13 November 2001 04:56 pm, dean gaudet wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 November 2001 04:35 pm, dean gaudet wrote: > > > On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Ryan Bloom wrote: > you might also want to think about webmux. 'cause i think it breaks some > more assumptions you're making (such as 1:1 mapping between client and > kernel network object).
I don't think the current code makes that assumption any more than the code did last week. Essentially, the server gets a connection, and any module is allowed to execute the accept function for that socket. Once the accept is done, the code works the way it always has. Ryan ______________________________________________________________ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL PROTECTED] Covalent Technologies [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------
