On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 09:27:27PM -0500, Padwa, Daniel wrote: > If 2.0.28 is good for beta except for a few files, why not just check out > 2.0.28, update the files you want, and then re-roll that as 2.0.29? Branch > if necessary to get only the changes you want. > > The whole versioning scheme as currently spec'd doesn't really make sense if > you can't do that. Does a re-roll require pulling all files at HEAD?
For the simple reason that we need all tarballs to be tagged in CVS, so we can regenerate/replicate them later if need be. > That said - I'd cast my (not-counted) vote for just making 2.0.28 beta. > Maybe to be followed up by another beta before year-end? Pretty please? I think that 2.0.28 is a big milestone for 2.0, so hopefully from now on we'll be able to release betas more often. -aaron
