On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:14:43PM -0500, Cliff Woolley wrote: > On Fri, 16 Nov 2001, David Reid wrote: > > > OK, so there has been one negative comment about my patch to fix this, does > > anyone else have an opinion? > > I personally think Roy's idea is a bit cleaner... but yours is definitely > easier to implement [and I don't have time to implement Roy's right now > :], so +0.9.
And my idea can be just as easily implemented after this fix is put in, so no worries there. My only question is whether or not David's patch will work given the vagaries of m4 macros. I haven't had time to test it (too many other things to clean up). ....Roy
