Are we in violation of section 2? Looks that way to me. License attached for
convenience... Easy enough to fix, if indeed it needs fixing.
Bill
PCRE LICENCE
------------
PCRE is a library of functions to support regular expressions whose syntax
and semantics are as close as possible to those of the Perl 5 language.
Written by: Philip Hazel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
University of Cambridge Computing Service,
Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Copyright (c) 1997-2000 University of Cambridge
Permission is granted to anyone to use this software for any purpose on any
computer system, and to redistribute it freely, subject to the following
restrictions:
1. This software is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
2. The origin of this software must not be misrepresented, either by
explicit claim or by omission. In practice, this means you must put
a sentence like this
Regular expression support is provided by the PCRE library package,
which is open source software, copyright by the University of
Cambridge.
somewhere reasonably visible in your documentation and in any relevant
files. A reference to the ftp site for the source should also be given
ftp://ftp.csx.cam.ac.uk/pub/software/programming/pcre/
in the documentation.
3. Altered versions must be plainly marked as such, and must not be
misrepresented as being the original software.
4. If PCRE is embedded in any software that is released under the GNU
General Purpose Licence (GPL), then the terms of that licence shall
supersede any condition above with which it is incompatible.
End
