On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 07:45:38PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote: > My guess is that once 2.0 goes GA, we'll all be busy fixing bugs and > working on more fun stuff for a while. Also, take a look at everything in > the ROADMAP file. 99% of it can be done as a dot release in the 2.0 > tree. Most of it doesn't require large portions of the code to be re-written.
Well, that's an issue of the contents in ROADMAP not its location. =) My original concern about ROADMAP being separated from a versioned source repository still stands. -- justin P.S. IMHO, the idea is that when we go GA, we're pretty damn certain there aren't a lot of bugs in it. When we say 2.0 is GA, we MUST mean that we 100% recommend switching from 1.3 to 2.0. I haven't seen any major showstoppers from 2.0.28, so we're on the right track. 2.0.29 should have performance improvements, but may have some bugs due to that...
