In a message dated 11/29/2001 3:23:27 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > As described by Ken? Once again, what would he have to do > > with that? > > I just happen to be the chap with the cron job that sends > the current STATUS file every Wednesday. I don't maintain it; > that's a shared responsibility (and one of its deficiencies, > IMHO, but I've ranted about that before :-). Then even more apologies are due and are hereby given. I thought that the 'final editing' of the auto-broadcast was someone's ongoing task ( yours ). Then I have no idea who added... +1 Cliff ( there's now another candidate to be evaluated ) ...or why that comment was so ambiguous. I really did 'miss' a message somewhere and I thought some guy named Cliff ( Wooley? Doesn't say ) submitted something for consideration as well and mod_gzip was already 'off' the table. This impression was then substantiated when a few people from the mod_gzip forum who were curious about the status of the 'mod_gzip 2.0 submission' queried this forum and got absolutely no reply from anyone. Doesn't matter now... But is it too much for future reference to ask STATUS file comments to be a little more explicit? It would help others track what's really happening there at Apache. Later... Kevin
