On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:02:53PM +0100, Sander Striker wrote: > > From: David Reid [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 22 December 2001 13:57 > > > The transaction stats were what jumped out at me - 7% increase in failed > > connections doesn't sound good to me :( But, then maybe I'm reading that > > wrong? > > Which is what I saw first too. But when I talked to Ian over irc <snippet>: > > [00:22] <IanHolsman> hey.. did you see the benchmark.. > [00:22] <IanHolsman> could you parse it > [00:22] <sander> Yes, saw it. > [00:22] <sander> No, could not parse. > [00:22] <IanHolsman> aah > [00:23] <IanHolsman> http://webperf.org/a2/caw/29/Current Total HTTP and TCP Errors >vs Load 21-Dec-2001 1215.gif is probably the > best image > [00:24] <sander> Under a higher load we get more errors with v30? > [00:24] <IanHolsman> if you look on v29 errors start happening around 500 users >sessions. with v30 they happen at 700 > [00:24] <IanHolsman> no... under a higher load you get less. > [00:24] <sander> Ah
How are "Unsuccessful" transactions defined? Failed connect()ions, incomplete HTTP requests? Invalid data returned? -aaron
