yea, I thought of that, but decided that I really wanted a license file that included everything used by httpd in the standard distro. I don't really have strong opinions one way or the other though.
Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 1:11 AM Subject: Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0 LICENSE > On Sun, Dec 23, 2001 at 05:39:41PM -0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > stoddard 01/12/23 09:39:41 > > > > Modified: . LICENSE > > Log: > > First cut an an all inclusive LICENSE file. Please feel free to format > > it differently and add any missing components. > > Shouldn't the apr and apr-util license notes be in the apr or > apr-util repositories, not in the httpd-2.0 repository? -- justin >
