On Sun, Jan 06, 2002 at 09:11:11PM -0800, Ryan Bloom wrote:
> I'm 100% in favor of this stuff, but please just keep using NO_DETACH for 
> this.  I didn't get the use case correct for NO_DETACH, but that doesn't mean
> we should add another option.

Fine with me. This does mean that the NO_DETACH behavior will change (for the
better, in my view).

-- 
Jos Backus                 _/  _/_/_/        Santa Clara, CA
                          _/  _/   _/
                         _/  _/_/_/             
                    _/  _/  _/    _/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]     _/_/   _/_/_/            use Std::Disclaimer;

Reply via email to