Bill Stoddard wrote: > > I question whether this chaged required a MMN major bump.
*shrug* The core config record is exposed only to files that #define CORE_PRIVATE. In our base package, that means include/http_config.h include/http_request.h main/http_config.c main/http_core.c main/http_log.c main/http_main.c main/http_protocol.c main/http_request.c main/http_vhost.c main/util_script.c modules/experimental/mod_mmap_static.c modules/proxy/mod_proxy.c modules/standard/mod_rewrite.h modules/standard/mod_so.c modules/standard/mod_status.c os/netware/mod_tls.c os/win32/mod_isapi.c Whether those files actually make use of the structure is another issue entirely; here are the ones that do: main/http_core.c main/http_protocol.c main/http_request.c main/util_script.c All of those are going to get rebuilt when the http_core.h file changes, so it could be justified that there be no bump at all. However, who knows what 3P modules use the structure? They probably oughtn't anyway, so I've no problem with changing this to a minor bump or even none. I *do* have a problem with what appears to be a non-technical veto, Roy. 2.0 isn't going to be out for months; even after it is take-up will take many more, and I dispute the statement that we're 'done' with 1.3. Certainly there's little development being done on it, but I think that's a matter of temperament, not policy. I do not see why functionality desired by existing users should be postponed indefinitely when it could be available now. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "All right everyone! Step away from the glowing hamburger!"
