> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 03:53:29PM -0500, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > > When we *do* go GA, are we planning on keeping this numbering? > > I think it'll confuse and dismay the public.. > > AIUI, I think we will be keeping this numbering. I don't think > it'll confuse the public because when we release/announce a > version, it'll contain a qualifier - i.e. alpha/beta/GA. So, > we could have: > > 2.0.31 Beta > 2.0.32 GA > 2.0.33 Alpha > 2.0.34 GA > 2.0.35 Beta > > Each version is independently judged as to its worthiness. > > I could be misinterpreting how we're intending to do this though. > Thoughts? -- justin > I don't have an issue with the numbering, but bouncing 2.0.* to GA to alpha and back again will be confusing as hell to a lot of people, especially to folks who develop and sell specialized Apache modules (RSA ClearTrust, Netegrity Siteminder, Vignette, etc)
Bill
