On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Greg Stein wrote: > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:23:05PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >... > > yeah, interesting point - that function could be kept in the apache tree > > if pcre dependencies are unacceptable. All the rest of the functions > > belong in apr-util. > > I'd rather see some more thought applied, than "move them all." For example, > ap_ind() and ap_rind() are bogus. For the rare case when somebody needs an > *index*, then they can compute the damned number themselves. No sense in > populating the API with noise.
heh, good point - we should just rip those out of the file anyways though... rind doesn't appear to be used at all, and ind is only used in a couple of modules...... sterling
