* On 2002-02-04 at 22:07, Roy T. Fielding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> excited the electrons to say: > > After the group spends enough time pounding on a release to call it GA, > there is no reason why we cannot take the code and reversion it a 2.1.0 > and start treating that as the stable branch. It may be a little > confusing to the Linux folks, but we can always skip to 2.2.0 if that > makes people happier. Personally, I tend to think that even-numbered > releases are less reliable than odd ones, because that has been my > experience with the quality of commercial releases.
Yar. Lotsa people say, "I never install an x.0 release; I always wait at least for x.1". Some manufacturers would make .even release 'feature' releases, and .odd ones 'fix' releases. > Of course, the real problem is that httpd developers these days just have > it too easy. When I was an RM, we had to get up at 4am and walk through > snow in our underwear And it was uphill both ways. :-) -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!"
