From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 11:18 PM
> >>I think it's a bug. The sub-directory can be password-protected. Does it > >>mean that mod_autoindex won't display it, since it'll fail to run the > >>sub-request? > >> > > > > By design, for better or worse [feel free to debate here.] > > > > The new logic [perhaps 1.3 as well, you would have to look] does a subrequest > > on the /~stas/ url ... and decides it's broken [or inaccessable, or whatever] > > and autoindex won't display it. What's broken about not displaying things that > > the user cannot access? > > I gave an example of a password protected sub-directory. You say that > it's correct not to display it then? How do you know whether the user > cannot access this directory? May be he does have the needed access > credentials. Fair enough - we can rescope the rules. Right now 200s and 300s pass. The test is right there in autoindex if you would like to change it. Personally, I never want to see 500'ed resources return OK ;-/
