Cliff Woolley wrote: > On 24 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> HTTPD-test is failing. >> but it was failing on 2.0.32 version of mod-include as well >> > > Really?? What's the verbose output? It worked fine for me when I tested > 2.0.32... I'll try it again with HEAD tomorrow. > > --Cliff > > 2.0.32 is clean 2.0.32 + CVS-HEAD of mod-include
# testing : GET /modules/include/exec/off/cmd.shtml # expected: '[an error occurred while processing this directive]' # received: '' not ok 8 # testing : GET /modules/include/exec/off/cgi.shtml # expected: '[an error occurred while processing this directive]' # received: '' not ok 30 and we get a core-dump in handle_exec/mod_cgi it looks like the ctx has some bad data (gdb) print *ctx $6 = {state = PARSED, flags = 11, if_nesting_level = 0, parse_pos = 3, bytes_parsed = 39, status = 0, output_now = 0, head_start_bucket = 0x0, head_start_index = 135541272, tag_start_bucket = 0x0, tag_start_index = 135541272, tail_start_bucket = 0x5, tail_start_index = 135541272, combined_tag = 0x24 <Address 0x24 out of bounds>, curr_tag_pos = 0xbfffe2a0 "exec", directive_length = 3221217957, tag_length = 4, error_str = 0x1f <Address 0x1f out of bounds>, error_str_override = 0x80944a0 "[an error occurred while processing this directive]", time_str = 0x0, time_str_override = 0x8093a95 "%A, %d-%b-%Y %H:%M:%S %Z", pool = 0x0, ssi_tag_brigade = 0x8143730, start_seq_pat = 0x8143ba8, start_seq = 0x8141b0c "", start_seq_len = 134822578, end_seq = 0x5 <Address 0x5 out of bounds>, re_string = 0x8093aae "-->", re_result = 0x0} (gdb)