Cliff Woolley wrote:
> On 24 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> 
>>  HTTPD-test is failing.
>>  but it was failing on 2.0.32 version of mod-include as well
>>
> 
> Really??  What's the verbose output?  It worked fine for me when I tested
> 2.0.32... I'll try it again with HEAD tomorrow.
> 
> --Cliff
> 
> 
2.0.32 is clean
2.0.32 + CVS-HEAD of mod-include


# testing : GET /modules/include/exec/off/cmd.shtml
# expected: '[an error occurred while processing this directive]'
# received: ''
not ok 8

# testing : GET /modules/include/exec/off/cgi.shtml
# expected: '[an error occurred while processing this directive]'
# received: ''
not ok 30

and we get a core-dump
in handle_exec/mod_cgi

it looks like the ctx has some bad data
(gdb) print *ctx
$6 = {state = PARSED, flags = 11, if_nesting_level = 0, parse_pos = 3, 
bytes_parsed = 39, status = 0, output_now = 0, head_start_bucket = 0x0,
   head_start_index = 135541272, tag_start_bucket = 0x0, tag_start_index 
= 135541272, tail_start_bucket = 0x5, tail_start_index = 135541272,
   combined_tag = 0x24 <Address 0x24 out of bounds>, curr_tag_pos = 
0xbfffe2a0 "exec", directive_length = 3221217957, tag_length = 4,
   error_str = 0x1f <Address 0x1f out of bounds>, error_str_override = 
0x80944a0 "[an error occurred while processing this directive]",
   time_str = 0x0, time_str_override = 0x8093a95 "%A, %d-%b-%Y %H:%M:%S 
%Z", pool = 0x0, ssi_tag_brigade = 0x8143730, start_seq_pat = 0x8143ba8,
   start_seq = 0x8141b0c "", start_seq_len = 134822578, end_seq = 0x5 
<Address 0x5 out of bounds>, re_string = 0x8093aae "-->", re_result = 0x0}
(gdb)

Reply via email to