> At 12:36 PM -0800 3/2/02, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > > > > >We actually tried to add it a while ago, but it was vetoed because HTTP > >doesn't need it. The overhead could actually be minimal, because the > >big stuff to move there is the protocol filters and the user/password > >information. > > > > Let's see how far the pointer split goes then... Still, the cleaner > solution is obvious :/
I agree, I'll implement today. ;-) Ryan
