On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:20:15AM -0800, Sander van Zoest wrote: > On Fri, 8 Mar 2002, Graham Leggett wrote: > > Aaron Bannert wrote: > > > +1 on adding new directives and not extending Options, especially since > > > this directive only relates to mod_proxy. > > I don't see why. > > In the case of mod_autoindex it already uses IndexOptions, maybe creating > a ProxyOptions is a better choice here? > > > The standard way of setting what is allowed and what is not allowed in > > an URL space is via Options. If proxy has its own directive, but > > everything else uses options, it's confusing and inconsistent. > > In that vain, you could consider IndexOptions to be inconsistent.
-1 for adding new Options-like directives for the reasons Ken just posted. -aaron
