On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 01:09:49PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote: > Any votes on this patch (even in concept if not on all the details)? If it looks >like what > we want to do, I'll polish it up and commit it.
+1 (concept). ap_set_content_type seems a better name though. My only implementation concern will be whether we ensure that we get the ordering right when inserting filters. (We can't just blindly insert them after the current filter - say we want to add an AP_FTYPE_CONTENT_SET filter - it has to be inserted after.) The docco should state that only AP_FTYPE_RESOURCE filters (or hooks run before filters) can change the content-type. -- justin
