At 08:49 AM 3/21/2002, you wrote: >Joshua Slive wrote: > > > Perhaps I missed something here, but isn't this exactly what the > > UseCanonicalName directive is for? Why are you hard-coding this? > >Hmmm - got me there - wasn't aware that the UseCanonicalName did this. >Will change it back :)
Please note that this is -why- 1.3 is in R-T-C mode, unlike 2.0. Please post patches first for that tree. Sorry if it appeared that Aaron, Cliff and I didn't follow that protocol, since the review happened off-list in security@ due to the nature of the patches.
