Greg Ames wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >> -apr_atomic_t apr_atomic_add(apr_atomic_t *mem, apr_uint32_t val) >> +apr_int32_t apr_atomic_add(apr_atomic_t *mem, apr_int32_t val) > > > Ian, > > Should we change the 2nd input param to apr_int32_t everywhere? This occured to > me when I used -1 there to implement apr_atomic_dec. And the return value for > apr_atomic_dec? Letting it go negative could be useful in some apps. > I can't see why not. t I'll go make sure the solaris stuff works
> Greg >
